Anniversary Candle

National Unitarian Fellowship

Affiliated to the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches

A faith for the 21st Century

A profile of Miles & Jane Howarth published in "The Unitarian" October 2004.

Miles Howarth

It's said that some have fame thrust upon them. In my case it was your Editor's request for this autobiographical article.

OK - I'm a Unitarian born and bred. My mother's family had been Lancashire Unitarians for many generations. Heirlooms include a silk parasol carried at the Opening Ceremony of Bank Street Chapel, Bolton in 1856, a Bible presented to the first couple married at Stand Chapel in 1839 and an armchair belonging to John Edward Taylor, the Unitarian Founder of the (Manchester) Guardian 1791-1844. John Gregson, whose Iegacy established the John Gregson Trust for the upkeep of historic Unitarian Chapels, was a great-uncle of mine.

Enough of history and nostalgia. What matters is the present and the future.

Actually I don't like the word 'Unitarian'. It smacks of seventeenth century theological controversy. Whatever may be the history of organised Unitarianism in the UK, and elsewhere, many people across the ages have preferred their religion to be intelligible (a better word than 'rational' which unwisely excludes emotion), consumerist (a more descriptive word than 'free'), progressive (life will always move on) and people-centred (Robinson Crusoe faced an impossible religious problem). Membership of a religious community implies a recognition that it can provide valuable support to one's faith life, and that it's worthwhile investing time, loyalty and resources for the purpose. For me Unitarianism provides a tradition and a community which suit me better than any others I have encountered. If I were attracted elsewhere, it would probably be because Unitarianism has failed to realise its enormous potential - hesitating to progress beyond its origins in the Christian tradition and, in the UK, its nineteenth century impetus. When at Oxford University I attended Services at Manchester College Chapel. The problem with such beautiful buildings is that they tend to dictate the forms of religious activity which take place in them. As time goes by, such activities can become decreasingly relevant to life in the real world.

These thoughts may help to explain why I have found particular value in the DIY approach to religion which is possible within a Fellowship. The inherent flexibility and mutual ministry have many attractions. Jane and I have been heavily involved in the development of the Chelmsford Unitarian Fellowship in Chelmsford since we moved to Essex in the mid-1970s. Such thoughts may also explain why we are also active members of the Sea of Faith Network 'exploring religious faith seen as a human creation'. Both are hard work, but creating and building has always been so. Most Sea of Faith members (who include quite a few Anglican clergy) would subscribe to the current GA Object, but does this Object go far enough in defining what we religious liberals actually stand for? My own view is that it doesn't. Perhaps we should look carefully at the affirmations of the American Unitarian Universalist Association. They are more positive, and move beyond Christianity. And UUA membership is still expanding. The current debate about the organisation of the Unitarian movement in the UK is necessary. More important is the debate about where we are going and how we might have more impact on ourselves and others. 'More of the same' is hardly a good policy when you're on a downward path. Keep young and avoid cynicism by adapting.

My professional career was in educational administration - teaching, then Warwickshire, Northamptonshire and latterly Essex County Councils. I am fortunate. This experience provides useful background for various voluntary activities. Since my first retirement, after busy years of public service, I have taken on various commitments to the Unitarian movement nationally, particularly where I have felt able to make a useful contribution - the Executive Committee of the British and Foreign Unitarian Association, the Hibbert and Gregson Trusts and, nostalgically after Presidency of the Foy Society many years ago, Trusteeship of their hostel at Flagg, Derbyshire. It's great having a Unitarian network of friendship with like-minded people in most parts of the UK; and, internationally, through IRF and IARF. I also believe in service to other types of community Chairmanship of the Parish Council of our village near Chelmsford and of an educational trust providing grants within the Borough of Chelmsford.

In the 1950s Lawrence Redfern, the highly successful minister of Ullet Road, Liverpool, remarked to me that 'Theology is dead'. I now agree. Whatever we mean by 'God', it is amply clear that the spiritual dimension remains a powerful motivator. Given our history and principles, Unitarians could take a lead in exploring and developing what makes for a resilient and responsible support structure for living life today. WorldWIde. Here we could work together with other religious liberals - not just those of Christian origin. After largely wasting the twentieth century (!), it's worth our moving ahead with great vigour.

Jane Howarth

I was originally an active Anglican, benefiting from services focusing on ethics. A move of house and a new vicar, together with preparation for confirmation, meant that the emphasis changed to the Anglican doctrinal system. This tightly argued system holds together until belief in an important element is undermined. In my late teens I wanted to be sure that a belief system with which I was identifying was credible. My suggestion that the young people's group should look at the first few hundred years of Christianity merely elicited a distant stare from the minister, but no response. The net result was a considerable amount of lonely thinking which led by stages to the sudden and overwhelming conclusion that there was no God. This is not something to wish on anyone, as it not only undermines a system of religious belief but leaves you to piece together a basis for your ethics and your relationships to others and to the created world. How much of the Christian ethical teaching could stand on its own merit without the doctrine? All that takes a bit of coping with.

After five years as a junior civil servant at 10, Downing Street, during which I read Bishop John Robinson's Honest to God, I went to Liverpool University, a wonderful experience, to train as a probation officer. I really enjoy the Winnie the Pooh stories. I am not a Rabbit character who can go and fetch what he needs, but more like Pooh, who waits for things to come to him. The change of career was the result of being taken over out of the blue by a sudden certainty that I should become a probation officer. Liverpool was a fertile place for things coming to me, and one of these was a powerful and enduring vision of the interconnectedness of all life. You never know when these things are going to happen - this one came during a tussle with a milk machine at Lime Street station one evening, when three strangers two small boys and a bowler hatted man joined in.

I met Miles when I moved to Northamptonshire to work, and he introduced me to Unitarians like Bill Steiner in the Bedfordshire Fellowship. Like Martineau, who revised a hymn book after only a few years to take account of Darwin's discoveries about evolution, Bill sought to rethink religion to take account of new knowledge. I have felt increasingly at home as a Unitarian (it does take time) and see our emphasis on the individual search for what is true for us in the light of the totality of our experience, and on the lack of immutable creeds, as extremely precious safeguards. They are, I think, the only safeguards against the common misuse of religion whereby too many members of many religions claim the superiority and exclusivity of their beliefs and use these claims to attack one another.

I still find myself wondering about the mystery behind creation and I am very interested in the thinking that is being developed in Sea of Faith and elsewhere about just what we mean by 'God'. The remembered experience of the interconnectedness of all life has remained a basis for how to live and relate to people, as well as giving me a sense that 'God' is the Whole, known and unknown. I value the encouragement, spiritual companionship and friendships that come from being in Unitarian company. Occasionally there is disappointment when someone implies that different views about the mystery, or different approaches to expressing our religion in services, are not 'Unitarian'. I have gained enormously from the new perspectives I get when I share ideas and services with people whose beliefs differ from mine, and this surely is part of the blessing of our tradition.

Miles and I are founder members of Chelmsford Unitarian Fellowship, and take our turn in leading informal moments of recollection, acknowledgment, meditation, and renewal before our discussion meetings. We can therefore appreciate the challenges facing Unitarian ministers and Lay Preachers in trying to satisfy all of us. I am very glad that our children had the opportunity to experience activities such as YUC week and IRF.

I believe organised religion results from an innate spiritual sense. Religions will continue to rise and fall. Sadly aspects of most organised religions have more to do with mediaeval battlements to keep out invaders than genuine pathways that strengthen life-affirming spiritual perspectives, or the skills needed to live together in difference. A key, multi-layered, but courageous (as Sir Humphrey would call it) challenge of today is managing spiritual difference and working on specific social issues with people from other religions. To me, helping this delicate process is a way for non-creedal Unitarians to be true to their social and religious tradition.



Valid HTML 4.01!